Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking a part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Moving towards the 21st century, many people are nowadays expressing a deeply growing concern about the role of sports in our contemporary life. In fact, there are whom some hold firmly to their belief that playing in a team, such as a football, volleyball brings several advantages for people and society. However, others argue convincingly that individual sports have an impact on the positive ways for people. Therefore, some arguments both for and against this issue will be express in the following paragraphs.
To the beginning, there are two main points for people to defend the former argument. First of all, it is a well-documented fact that it has a significant contribution to improve skills related to interacting skills, such as communication and teamwork skills. The most obvious example to prove is that people tend to be more individual in modern life, so developing sports in teams helps the society interaction better, as well as in the workplace or study of children. Furthermore, there is no doubt that team sports bring the value of our daily living when an individual becomes a part of the community. For instance, when we play a sport, such as football, this can improve spirits, friendships between the players.
On the other hand, there are two primary pieces of evidence for people to support the latter argument. First and foremost, it is commonly accepted that when someone plays an individual sport, it can enhance personal skills better cause they know what their weaknesses are. A clear example to prove is that a person who plays in an individual sport is being able to manage their emotions, release stresses, build their self-confidence and independence. Moreover, there is no denying that it helps to develop a stronger mindset. This view is supported by the fact that when they set their target, they must do by themselves to pass over the difficulties when it does not helps from no one to achieve the best result.
All things are considered, it is my firm belief that sports that are playing in teams provide a range of benefits to people. Accordingly, I firmly recommend the governments should enhance people’s awareness in terms of the crucial role of sports in our community. If this recommendation is carried out, the comprehensive development of our society will be guaranteed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both these views and give your opinions 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both these views and give your opinions 67
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both these views and give your opinions 73
- Deforestation caused human activity is happening in many parts of the world 78
- Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of using to the Internet in our activities 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 670, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
... over the difficulties when it does not helps from no one to achieve the best result....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04922279793 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90473664319 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551813471503 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.897603799 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.647058824 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165258040758 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538696397977 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325611824506 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1026742355 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311590182405 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.