Tpo23
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Nowadays, a prime and fundamental controversy on the issue whether speedy working and risk taking is better or doing things slowly and confidentialy is. Some people would claim that the time that you spend on a job is not importnat than the correctness of it. However, as well as I am concerned, I agree that working out of the comfort zone in a high rate of actions is more practical for two following reasons.
The first and foremost reason that I prefer to illustrate is that exprimental work has a more better influence to the employees and workers of a company. A relevant example can shed light on this assertion. 3 years ago, when I was working on an intenational art project in Londan, I started to focus on the faults and the wins between a group on young artists. Moreover, I spent an enormous amount of time to deal with that group of artist in the galleries and studios to find facts of their success and defeat. Thus, The artists who was working by concentration of the theories couldn't get that much eyses but, the new generation of the artworkers who has a great energy on making mistakes could get better results at the end.
The second reason that could be taken into account is that the pace of working can affect on the number of finished projects by an individual. For instance, resulsts of a recent research study at George Washington University demonstrated that as much as a student works on a specific subject he/she could gain a more favorable result. On the other hand, in experts and socialogists opinion, when humankind wants to have a siutable result on every problem he/she makes more and more flaws. Hence, a critical method for thinking plays a crucial role in making convenient finall of the initial errors.
To sum up, I firmly believe in the effects of the trial and error style of working in in getting good conclusion for two main reason. first, experimental working can help us to have a better condition and a live atmosphere for any job. What is more, the number of errors and experiences we have increases by working quickly.
- T P O 53 Integrated Writing Tasks 3
- tpo 37One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest t 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 78
- Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better? 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families Help from the government is unnecessary 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...lustrate is that exprimental work has a more better influence to the employees and workers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...orking by concentration of the theories couldnt get that much eyses but, the new genera...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...account is that the pace of working can affect on the number of finished projects by an i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...of the trial and error style of working in in getting good conclusion for two main re...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ng good conclusion for two main reason. first, experimental working can help us to ha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s we have increases by working quickly.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67213114754 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66550185077 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581967213115 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2119029548 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242349059472 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715096275863 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359066287536 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138392005429 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185793500758 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.