In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Nowadays, working efficiency is one of the most important factors to measure whether an employee is qualified or not. Some people believe that working quickly and taking risks to make some mistakes is much more important than making sure everything is right with a slow working tempo, while others hold the opposite view. From where I stand, I still think working slowly to ensure a qualified result is vital important.
First of all, companies could not afford the expensive consequences caused by mistakes by working at the fast speed. A small mistake in the workplace might relate to hundreds people and waste a large amount of money and energy. My brother's experience provides a striking example. My brother works in a technology company as an accountant. He is a confident man who always wants to finish the job as quick as possible and never wastes time on reviewing what he have done. Last year, after he completing the budget of one program, he directly sent it to the manager without checking. After few days, he was severely critized by his leader because he made a mistake on the budget number and the program team was super shocked after knowing they could get ten times of money and soon spent the money buying things they needed. As a result, a lot of money was wasted due to my brother's careless. Had if he worked slowly and checked it again, his company would not have lost so much money.
Moreover, working slowing but with high quality can actually improve working efficiency. This is because worker could finish the task at once due to their careful and responsible performance. However, if the worker only care about complete that job as soon as possibly, the mistakes made by him would waste a lot of time to find and correct. For instance, my friend Jennie and I used to participated a program. She was a really careful person who always took an responsible and serious attitude to her work. On the contrary, I only cared about the progress of the program and wanted to finish it in a short time. Therefore, I always tried my best to complete the job in the minimal time without checking it again. As a result, I found a lot of problems in my previous work which I spent great amount of time to revise them. However, due to Jennie's carefulness, her work was perfect even though she did it slower than me. In the end, Jennie still finished the whole program earlier than me and had better qualiy at the same time. Had I not have worked in such fast speed, I would have better working efficiency.
In sum, I still believe that it is more important to work slowly to make sure everything is right than taking risks to work quickly.
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 83
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 14 76
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some t 3
- some people believe that it is an important part of a chid s education to go on field trips others think that a child s time is better spent in a classroom at school 73
- It is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students to learn 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... never wastes time on reviewing what he have done. Last year, after he completing th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'completes'.
Suggestion: completes
... what he have done. Last year, after he completing the budget of one program, he directly ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...a really careful person who always took an responsible and serious attitude to her...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62367864693 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45624657661 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509513742072 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.971195844 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7083333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332461119815 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907055860282 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132001684325 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299592980026 0.150856017488 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189393932274 0.0645574589148 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... never wastes time on reviewing what he have done. Last year, after he completing th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'completes'.
Suggestion: completes
... what he have done. Last year, after he completing the budget of one program, he directly ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...a really careful person who always took an responsible and serious attitude to her...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62367864693 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45624657661 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509513742072 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.971195844 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7083333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332461119815 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907055860282 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132001684325 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299592980026 0.150856017488 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189393932274 0.0645574589148 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.