In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Nowadays, working efficiency is one of the most important factors to measure whether an employee is qualified or not. Some people believe that working quickly and taking risks to make some mistakes is much more important than making sure everything is right with a slow working tempo, while others hold the opposite view. From where I stand, I still think working slowly to ensure a qualified result is vital important.
First of all, companies could not afford the expensive cost caused by careless mistakes. A small fault in the workplace might require a large amount of time and energy to revise, which is a huge unnecessary loss for the company. My brother's personal experience provides a striking example for this. My brother used to work in a technology company as an accountant. He was a super confident man who always wanted to complete the task as soon as possible and never waste time on reviewing to show his work ability. Last year, he confidently finished the budget of a program proposal in a short time without checking twice. After a few days, he was severely criticized by his leader due to the mistake he made on the budget number. Because of this, the company lost a chance to bid a key program, which directly led to lose million dollars because of my brother's careless. Had if he worked gradually and carefully, the company would have gone through such failure.
Moreover, working slowly but with high accuracy can indeed improve working efficiency. This is because those careful and cautious employees with slow working pace are able to complete the task at once, avoiding to investigate mistake over again and again by the end. For instance, my friend and I were into a program in the university. She is a very prudential girl who always keeps her eye on the tasks she is in to reduce mistake, even though she dose not have a quick progress. On the contrary, I am type of person who only cares about the progress of program and wants to finish it in the minimal time without checking or revising. As a result, I found a lot of mistakes at the end and required me to take time to revise them, which largely decreased my working efficiency. Finally, my friend perfectly finished her program earlier than me with high quality. Had if I did not have worked carelessly in such fast pace, I would have better working efficiency.
In sum, I still believe that it is more important to work slowly to make sure everything is right than taking risks to work quickly.
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 88
- some people believe that it is an important part of a chid s education to go on field trips others think that a child s time is better spent in a classroom at school 73
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 80
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 83
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 822, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...key program, which directly led to lose million dollars because of my brothers careless...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoiding investigating'.
Suggestion: avoiding investigating
... are able to complete the task at once, avoiding to investigate mistake over again and again by the end...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'doses'.
Suggestion: doses
...s in to reduce mistake, even though she dose not have a quick progress. On the contr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'quick progress'.
Suggestion: quick progress
... mistake, even though she dose not have a quick progress. On the contrary, I am type of person w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71330275229 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5444154444 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552752293578 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.507632849 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334652136927 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094285009279 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141110224831 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295995557354 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194755159312 0.0645574589148 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.