The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999)
The bar chart illustrates the European workers in the United states in the year of 1999.
Overall,the least number of employees who came to America from France arrange about four and half thousand people. In the top of European employees is British people who had been worked in United states in 1999 approximately 26 hundred workers.
The average part of all workers in America is 25 thousand people make up the rest of the country which is quite a large number of people working in 1999. In the second place of employment is Germans which in total becomes 25 thousand people. In contrast, visitors from France who are looked to find a job did not make even 7000 workers. Moreover, If calculate the employees from France and Italy, obviously seen that this number are not even reach the mark of 11 thousands.
In the end, the number of workers who arriving to America rising rapidly. Furthermore, in the near future this number could reach supreme figures.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-08 | Heyps | 78 | view |
2020-01-08 | Heyps | 78 | view |
2020-01-08 | Heyps | 56 | view |
2020-01-08 | PennybooomC4 | 56 | view |
2020-01-08 | Shakhzod Yodgorov | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the whole world and in different parts of the world 73
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999) 78
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ed states in the year of 1999. Overall,the least number of employees who came to A...
^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... the rest of the country which is quite a large number of people working in 1999. In the second p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, in contrast, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80722891566 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46282418694 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4244191448 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296752162724 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122266415611 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11905679443 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211690711721 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132299280333 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.