Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Do you agree or disagree ?
It is integral for national officials to cut the rate of crime by keeping criminals in captivity. However, I am of the opinion that offenders should be provided with job training and vocational training rather than being sent to jail.
Imprisonment, without doubt, do more harm than good to the society as a whole. Firstly, people who carry out confinement to prison loss the ability to function prosocially as they are isolated with the community. They, admittedly , could not catch up with the fast pace of living outside prison. Therefore, after rehabilitation, there will be no chances for offenders to make a fresh start and they might re-offend as they confuse to ensure a decent living standard. Secondly, there is a high probability of recidivism which prisoners might reinforce each other’s antisocial and criminal behaviours. For example, being surrounded with an avalanche kind of law-breakers, who have done wicked things, will become other’s incentives to repeat guilty acts over time.
Therefore, I side with those who contend that better education provisions are more appropriate way of dealing with offenders. This can apparently change their delinquent attitudes towards society and family. For instance, some rampant wrongdoers who share a similar set of psychological problems should take part in a consultant session in order to check-up and search for a cure for their well-being. They will no longer commit a crime once they are in a good state of mind. Furthermore, for all intends and purposes, money is the main inducement to engage in criminal activities. With vocational training, many crime can be nip in the bud. They have chances to acquire more earning capacity and improve job skills, such as problem solving, communication and teamwork, which are meagre in the past.
Taking into those above-mentioned characteristics, one can conclude that imprisonment does not make the most of reducing crime than educational provision does.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-06 | giangngoc | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | trlnanhh | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | jagrit sharma | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | lostsonam | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | quangtranchinh | 84 | view |
- International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do advantages outweight the disadvantages? 78
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on research other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world.What are the reason for this,and how can people learn more about the natural world? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted with the community. They, admittedly , could not catch up with the fast pace o...
^^
Line 9, column 609, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun crime seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much crime', 'a good deal of crime'.
Suggestion: much crime; a good deal of crime
...l activities. With vocational training, many crime can be nip in the bud. They have chance...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37179487179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03553049495 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637820512821 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5411178395 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15899999811 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503034952992 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405953704699 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875662655435 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229128657629 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.