it is better to travel to foreign countries when you are young than when you are older.
Nowadays, with the advance in economy and transportation, more and more people can travel out on vocation. Here comes the problem of whether it is better to travel to foreign countries at a young age or when you are older, people's opinions varied. From my point of view, I prefer to travel abroad as young as possible.
To start with, traveling at a young age is more relaxing and free for people who are occupied with overload work or study. Taking a glimpse of this society, modern people work under considerable pressure and live in a fast-paced life, which makes them stressed out. As it is evident, traveling to a remote region is a means for tired people to get out of a busy lifestyle and heavy workload. So it should be realized that the primary function of traveling for modern people is to give them free and relaxed. Here comes a concrete example of myself. When I graduated from college, I figured out that nothing else could be more relaxing than having an extended vacation in foreign countries. I went to New Zealand for a holiday for a month. I had a chance to experience beautiful scenery, go hiking, go surfing, and visit Hobbiton, which was an excellent opportunity for me to get out of self and to relax. As a result, there is every reason to believe that with the aid of traveling, people feel refreshed and relaxed by walking out of their stressing and suffocating life. But for the old who have retired, they have plenty of leisure time to enjoy life. Thus, they cannot benefit a lot from traveling.
Meanwhile, by traveling, young people are capable of broadening horizons. To be more specific, the young generation has a thorough understanding of various history and culture in tourist attractions. Only after stepping on those attractions in person can youngsters fully immerse themselves in its real cultural surroundings that cannot be read from textbooks. Taking myself for an example, visiting the Statue of Liberty in the USA, I am likely to know American's love and wish of freedom. Additionally, young people have access to different ways of thinking through communicating with residents from different backgrounds, leading to a better understanding of world culture. These life experiences brought by traveling would become a part of wealth, constituting a stepping stone to future development. However, for those older people, experiencing various cultures has nothing to do with their personal development.
To sum up, I would like to reiterate my standpoint that people should travel to foreign countries at a young age. One reason is to relax from overwhelming work and study. Another goal is to widen their eyes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | neilyuan | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree after high school graduates should take at least one year off to work or travel before entering university 78
- The main role of a university professor is to educate students rather than do research 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least one year to work or travel It s better than attending university straight away 90
- At one high school more of the students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many of students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignment The school is considering making a change t 85
- It is easier to be well educated today than it was in the past 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, while, as a result, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9375 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84197985387 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549107142857 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5212365243 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201870935151 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532545912623 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101210224736 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154803233993 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121380809811 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.