Lack of fresh water is becoming a global issue of increasing importance.
What problems does this shortage cause?
What measures could be taken to overcome these problems?
Water scarcity is becoming a significant global problem with far-reaching effects. Long-term solutions
require extensive government intervention in programmes, including research and climate mitigation
measures, but individuals also need to become aware of the need for water conservation.
A major problem for all countries is the huge amount of water necessary for agriculture and industry.
When there is insufficient water, crops fail, animals die and people go hungry. Without an adequate
water supply, manufacturers, food producers, mining operations and businesses cannot succeed.
Ultimately, water is the key to economic prosperity.
Water shortages create particular difficulties in developing countries. Firstly, many women and
children in these countries have to spend the whole day walking to and from a remote water source
to fetch water. Consequently, these children miss school and often do not receive an adequate
education. Secondly, the water that is available for daily use may be contaminated, and this can lead
to illness and even death.
One of the most important long-term solutions to this problem is to work towards reducing global
warming and climate change, as dry regions are becoming drier across the planet. Additionally,
pollution of waterways needs to be addressed, as we take steps to clean up our existing supplies of
this precious resource. Many old-fashioned irrigation schemes are generally very wasteful, so funds
need to be available for research into water conservation and new irrigation technologies. These
technologies could then be transferred to developing nations. At an individual level, we need to
become aware of wasteful water-use habits, such as watering lawns in the summer, or pouring our
grey water down the drain. In conclusion, the inadequate supply of fresh water is one of the most
crucial environmental problems facing our planet, and we need to work to preserve this precious
resource.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | neverlandforestcat | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Saket Choudhary | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Saket Choudhary | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-23 | vishal sachdeva | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-29 | d_kumar | 84 | view |
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology IT for example the World Wide Web and communication by email However these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive in th 89
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology IT for example the World Wide Web and communication by email However these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive in th 76
- obesity is worldwide question for every country What are the solutions to stop this What are the causes of obesity 84
- some people think that mobile phones are harmful to children while others disagree Discuss both the views and give your opinion 65
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6936026936 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09327755621 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4902118593 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238258608295 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794293490562 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450642893112 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659118837871 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431344923057 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6936026936 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09327755621 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4902118593 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238258608295 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794293490562 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450642893112 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659118837871 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431344923057 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.