Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, globalization has been considered as one of the debatable subjects in the world. While some people have a conviction that availability of the same products all over the world will bring benefits, others believes that this global village has serious implications. This essay will elaborate how both of the aforementioned viewpoint has their own merits and drawbacks, and I think in spite of some advantages, its adverse impacts outweighed.
First and foremost, if all the people utilize the same products, the discussion of discrimination inevitably will be decreased. Undoubtedly, presenting unique productions can lead to better understanding of each other, therefore world becomes better place for living. Assuming a child who has no idea about having a Barbie doll or eating a Kit-Kat chocolate. By means of this trend, he/she can have an exposure to stuffs that never can occur in the lifetime and consequently he/she can experience similar feelings.
To support the opposite notion, due to opposing the alike goods, local subjects will be gradually eradicated. Since the new circumstances impulse many of the people to utilize like each other, traditional products will have not that much fans, however, they might be even more fascinating. For instance, according to a survey had been conducted in 2017 at Harvard University, 70% of the native production in one of the well-known village in Africa is not being used anymore and residents of that region have serious concerns about the elimination of their traditions which have been inherited from their ancestors.
On the basis of the points mentioned above although availability of the productions throughout the world would seems interesting, I strongly believe that preservation of the local products is far more crucial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Tabassum Zaman | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-23 | Delara | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | sameersomaya | 87 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | sameersomaya | 87 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 89
- Do you agree or disagree:“It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.” 76
- is wining the most important aspect of playing a game? 73
- Has technology made the world a better place to live? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...traditional products will have not that much fans, however, they might be even more ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
... productions throughout the world would seems interesting, I strongly believe that pr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3829787234 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0256789589 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4253644807 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149296356762 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542322714288 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449360033087 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093233182903 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276702484154 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.