It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Draw a distinction between good and bad is one of the imperative skills that should be taught from the primary ages of individuals. It is becoming increasingly common that people persist to punishment for teaching this particular skill to children. From my perspective, I find this statement completely disagreeable and I think there are other steps that can be taken for achieving this goal rather than penalties.
Some people hold the idea which is punishment as an essential approach for training children in distinguishing between right and wrong. I completely refuted this method of fostering due to some clear negative results. The first and foremost, statistics show that the more punishment in childhood was, the more risk of crime in future will. To dig a little deeper, an individual who had a troubled childhood would be imposed of crime more than a person who had a carefree childhood. Another argument in rebutting it is the irreparable casualties in children’s sprit has been becoming from penalties. Punishment make them cynical to everything even their parents and hurt their feelings. The last but not least, punishment plays a significant role in willing of people to tell lie. To sum up, punishment is rejected for considering as a mean of teaching skill to children.
I definitely believe that there are other better approaches for training children. Children are affected by their dear and near ones such as parents or educationalist. So, they could teach them by indirect way. To be more specific, parents must learn them practically by their function in choosing between good and bad in various circumstances of life. Besides, they should talk to their offspring about the benefits that they can reap by opting right choice. In these ways, draw a distinction between right and wrong can be institutionalized in children’s mindset without any negative side effects.
In conclusion, it seems to me that punishment should be omitted from teaching tools and other logical approaches such as indirect and practical method and be aware of results should be superseded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-08 | hau le | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | hannie10112002 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | mahyarr | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | mahyarr | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | Mahdi_Farhani | 67 | view |
- More and more people are now moving away from an agricultural background to cities for work What will be the consequences of this What solution you can offer 84
- n some countries in Europe some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job Other children stay in schools which provide a more general academic education What should schools do to prepare s 56
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent 73
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent 73
- Write a letter to the manager of the hotel In your letter give details of what went wrong explain what you had to do to overcome the problem at the time say what action you would like the manager to take You do NOT need to write your own address Begin you 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ware of results should be superseded.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19174041298 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99690787761 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545722713864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2427647771 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257124524217 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784071869158 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456776366891 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148571359251 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522644572108 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.