At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
In some countries, especially underdeveloped and developing countries, unbalancing in the longevity is more complicate. Some people think that the number of countries having young population brings so many benefits, but others argue that the young population is the indication of influences. In my following essay, I will discuss two aspects of this view before my conclusion is drawn.
It is no denying that there are many advantages made from the young adults within a country. Firstly, you people are the main labor which contributes to develop the economic. Nowadays, state of industrialization and modernization grow faster than before, therefore the young labor plays an important role to help increase the average income in an economy. Take China as an example, one of some reasons why China is the best factory of the world is that this country supply abundant of labor with low cost. The young people not only contribute economics growth but also help develop technology and science sectors. In the modernization world, technology and artificial intelligence play vital important roles. Some ideas and creations from young adults can bring more benefits which help the life easier.
On the other hand, compared with most old population countries, young population countries show the indication of weakness on healthcare systems. Most underdeveloped and developing nations invest the majority of money to develop their economic instead of enhancing healthcare systems. Therefore, the life expectancy in these countries is lower than others. Moreover, many countries where have more young people may not care about their cultures and histories. While elderly people tend to protect and conserve the traditional cultures, young adults concentrate to their careers and economic development.
In conclusion, although young adults bring many advantages such as science and economic, I believe that old population is a certain tendency and it also prevents the economic growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-14 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | xxlusubuxx | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | englishessays | 73 | view |
- Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing medicines intended for human use Others however think it is cruel and unnecessary Discuss both views and give your own opinion 80
- In some countries small town center shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars 73
- In some countries small town center shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51147540984 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92762468462 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9463316208 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241973626409 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750400654146 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633709204641 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14464671905 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317171404692 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51147540984 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92762468462 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9463316208 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241973626409 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750400654146 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633709204641 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14464671905 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317171404692 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.