At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
The issue of population has been brought into focus recently. It is common that the population of the young is more than the senior in some countries. From my perspective, my view is that including a huge number of young adults can bring about more advantages for a country compared to any problems that it might bring.
One obvious advantages is that the development of the economic almost depends on the young people. This is because working-age people more than retired people means that there is plenty of labor, which can promote the development of different industries. Therefore, the country enters rapid development.
Another significant advantage to consider is that the pressure for the aged of the young people would decrease. If the population of young adults were lower than the ageing population, young adults would need to afford enormous pension expenditures, which could improve the stress of young people and have some negative effects on older people's happiness such as Japan.
It is true that too many young adults in countries may bring some minor problems. One problem is that young people do not have too much experience in working, which could lead to some problems in the development process. Also, many adults in the working age stages, which could enhance competitiveness, thereby increasing people employment pressure. However, the problems can be solved. If they want, older people could return to the working places to help the young adults. Government could encourage young people to set up their business to creat more jobs.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that promoting the development of economic and decreasing the pressure for the aged far outweigh any of the minor problems that could result from some countries with a large population number of young adults.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-14 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | xxlusubuxx | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | englishessays | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18088737201 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68628652741 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515358361775 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3299464321 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320054694625 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101615281219 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601982138297 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183028591206 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412155918455 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18088737201 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68628652741 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515358361775 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3299464321 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320054694625 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101615281219 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601982138297 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183028591206 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412155918455 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.