Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Nowadays people are arguing a lot concerning education systems over the world raising controversial issues from the inequality of opportunities among generations to more micro- issues such as how to build the educational process, whether the interests of students matter or not etc. While one might be absolutely convinced that the last one doesn’t play a crucial role at all, a number of recently published exploration claim that this is in fact a case.
First of all, it should be said that as it has been proved by a blizzard of instances in the history of education, there is quite a considerable correlation between the interest to the subject and the outcome from covering this subject. By the outcome in the previous sentence we mean not the test results or the got mark on a topic rather than comprehensive understanding all small details and convoluted ways of developing of the main theme and ability to modify further appeared through the educational process ideas.
For further covering this issue, let’s take a lucid example which is here the University of Harvard where this fact has been already realized and the commensurate actions have been applied in a real live. As we all know, this university is well-known an incubator of leads of opinions and breakthrough innovators. Moreover, what is interesting and breath-taking is that in certain courses there no any exam for testing material, however there is a strict requirement to make notes and reflections on each part of new information. The main point behind of this is that you are already assumed to read and understand the core material and now you have to be able to apply this info to different appropriate parts of your own life taking into consideration your life experience and interests.
Moving back to the introduction, one could fallaciously conclude that the theme of a subject is not significant at all and that what matters is just interests of pupils. However, it would be a huge mistake since the world has been changing at an unprecedented scale from decade to decade and so have the requirements to skills. Presumably, while educating in cutting-edge fields is powerful, so is taking into consideration interests of students.
Having analyzed all the facts mentioned above, it could be easily concluded that there must be a trade-off between covered themes in the course and urgent issues that disturb students, since without the heart in this process the ultimate repercussion would be so technical, fruitless and not worthwhile.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 70
- Animals debate 78
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 70
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...taking is that in certain courses there no any exam for testing material, however ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06474820144 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98362207754 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5812249978 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.0 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.75 23.4991977007 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125595941024 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049371600436 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476051196177 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682408722218 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347366484038 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.1392134831 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.