The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart below illustrates the number of oil barrels which is manufactured among 6 countries as Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and UAE from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that the total production of oil almost increased considerably in all nations except that of oil in Qatar. Specially, Saudi Arabia held the lion’s share of yielding oil among 6 countries in 2010.
At first glance, while Arabia was a country which accounted for the highest rank of the total yield oil with 45 million barrels, Qatar is plunged into the bottom just at 2,5 million in that of oil. The rate of increasing oil production in Arabia had a significant growth over the period shown.
In addition, the capacity of oil manufactures in other nations did not have a remarkable transformation in the given chart with being total at 13 million barrels. Another noteworthy observation, the beginning state of UAE production remained unchanged at approximately 3 million barrels in 2000 and 1996. There is a modest growth with gradually 0,5 million in Iraq, UAE, Iran and Kuwait over a period of 20 years between 1990 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | jadenguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | vivitoben | 84 | view |
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not all necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion with relevant examples 73
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news program 78
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 42
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 08 2019 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 08 2019 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88421052632 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74974690349 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229772001128 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104867912374 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345991480826 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148206809265 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250557196675 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.