Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society. Because of this, all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Taking good care of offspring is the most important responsibility of parents. Therefore, some people believe that it should be compulsory for them to take parenting courses to become good fathers and mothers. Personally, although these classes can be beneficial to some extent, I dissent from the idea that they should be mandatory.
On the one hand, people can reap several benefits from these training courses. The babies often have a weak immunity whose functions are not developed comprehensively. Thus, parenthood preparation courses will help parents know about first aid skills, basic pathology information, and how to deal with emergencies. For instance, when babies convulse, they are likely to know how to loosen their babies’ collar before taking them to the hospital if they attend these courses already. Secondly, the balance of baby nutrients is also a vital matter in which people could be taught in these classes.
Nonetheless, it is impractical to force people to attend these parenting lessons. Firstly, there are numerous parents who are having trouble with their budgets. They have to work overtime, in the evening, or even at the weekend to earn money to make ends meet. Therefore, they have no time and cash to take these classes. Secondly, taking these courses is not the only way to resolve this problem. Nowadays, there are many ways, such as books, news, or websites which teach people how to become good parents. They are so cheap and convenient for those who are always busy. Therefore, I think that they should be free to choose whether or not they want to join these classes.
In conclusion, despite some benefits mentioned above, I strongly support that parents should take part in parenthood preparation courses voluntarily, not through being required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-05 | louis12893 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | raghibah | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | Minyuu_Ivy | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | Minyuu_Ivy | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | victory89 | 78 | view |
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many universities now offer online classes as an alternative to classes on campus Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university
- Some people choose to have their first child at an older age What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...hink that they should be free to choose whether or not they want to join these classes. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21034482759 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6768594835 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.093297599 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8823529412 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233919205153 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767642896529 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072019895053 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167161065133 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884206985941 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.