the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the yearly numbers of tourists vacationing on either cruise ships or island on a Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Overall, while the sum of visitors on the Caribbean island increased significantly throughout this period, there were downward trends in the numbers of visitors staying on cruise ships and island in the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 periods respectively.
As can be seen from the line graph, after staying constant at around 0.75 million visitors in 2011, the figure for vacationers on island grew considerably by nearly 0.75 million people. Nevertheless, the number of guests staying on island in 2016 was approximately 0.25 million as small as that in 2015. By contrast, this number increased after 2016 and shared the same figure with that in 2015, which accounted for about 1.5 million tourists.
Regarding tourists staying on cruise ships, there was a slight rise of roughly 0.5 million people in that number between 2010 and 2011. Afterward, 0.5 million visitors staying on cruise ships dropped in a year later. In addition, the number of tourists who vacationed on cruise ships in 2017, just over 2 million people, was around 4 times as large as that in 2012, nearly 0.5 million people
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The chart and table give information about health resources and life expectancy in different countries 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64285599511 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9985039656 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161524710175 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090002243865 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087804001932 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136234812254 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967576817068 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64285599511 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9985039656 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161524710175 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090002243865 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087804001932 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136234812254 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967576817068 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.