Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Todays, in the fast world with everyday new thechnologies, we need to improve our abilities and this is depend on more time. Also, saving enery and time would be the results of minimizing the days' wotk. I personally prefere to have less days for long hours. There is some reasons which I will explore in the following pargraphs.
First and foremost, in todays' competetive job market we should improved our skills and learn new things. Every days we are faced by new technological issues. With learning more and more about these new things we could have promoted. The less days working give us time to concentrate on these new learning objects. Not only we have time for attending the cources but also, we have time to practice on them and learn them deeply. For example, one years ago my officer had decided to change the system of financing in the company. I, as a financer, did not know anything about that new system. As a result, I had to learn it, if not, it would be harmful for my position. Therefore, I went to a class after the work time for weeks and it made me so tired and affected on my productivity at work. If I had some free days in the week, I could have had time to attend the course without pressure and anxiety. So, people with free days in their weekly job time could enhance their knowledge and opportunity.
Second, there are some benefits for company. Working in more hours in 3 days a week is enough time for doing every employees tasks. Every individuals spend a lot of their time in a horrible daily trafic. When you go 3 days a week, you can save these rush hours and use it to finish your tasks. It enhance the prodictivity. Also, it can help companies to save the energy. Todays, we face with a lot of problem with green gasses because of over using of fossil foils. With decreasing the time of using them, it would be helpful for solving the climate change issue. As an instance, Our company every mounth has an alarm for overusing of using electricity. It is clear that with increasing the work days, they can save the energy. It would be reasonable for companies to minimize their time hours on 3 days a week.
In conclusion, with three days fully time work a week, not only employees use the advantages but also companies can use benefits like as more professional employee, saving energy, and productivity maximizing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 60
- Do you agree or disagree It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for longer hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ed to improve our abilities and this is depend on more time. Also, saving enery and ti...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... results of minimizing the days wotk. I personally prefere to have less days for long hours. There...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...days wotk. I personally prefere to have less days for long hours. There is some reas...
^^^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are some reasons'?
Suggestion: There are some reasons
...efere to have less days for long hours. There is some reasons which I will explore in the following p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... new things we could have promoted. The less days working give us time to concentrat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one year', 'a year', or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: one year; a year; years
...hem and learn them deeply. For example, one years ago my officer had decided to change th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...h time for doing every employees tasks. Every individuals spend a lot of their time i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
...urs and use it to finish your tasks. It enhance the prodictivity. Also, it can help com...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...o save the energy. Todays, we face with a lot of problem with green gasses because of over using...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54352941176 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51671230586 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491764705882 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4425781851 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5185185185 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7407407407 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3176231158 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877707158692 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07858279744 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190558601849 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480973333188 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.