The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the advanced medical technology will expand human’s life" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that increasing the life expectancy might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effects of medical technologies on human's life can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, expanding human’s life by the advanced medical technology can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that human's well-being and medical care are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the influence of human's health on the society's activities. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both new medical techniques and saving the patients' life distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of medical science, without the slightest doubt, the expansion of human's life by medical technologies might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of chronic diseases. Moreover, fundamental aspects of medical technologies can relate to the reality that the demerits of drugs' side-effects can pertain to the body's reactions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of surgery errors were correlated positively with the surgeon's skills, the local authorities would ultimately address the lack of modern hospitals. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of new treatments.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of expanding human’s life by the advanced medical technology far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
- We have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish What are the causes and what are your solutions 88
- Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher To what extent do you agree 85
- Because university degrees can get jobs with higher salaries university students should pay full cost for their education Do you agree or not 88
- Media make people lose contact with real life do you agree or disagree 88
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... the effects of medical technologies on humans life can be a plus, and I will analyze ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...h new medical techniques and saving the patients life distinctly can be observed. Wit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83044982699 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19500289297 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5015544831 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.181818182 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337753078341 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127766526713 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104071410408 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215697562968 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535618696572 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.