The advanced medical technology will extend human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of the advanced medical technology and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the use of medications is highly beneficial, such issue is regarding thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the improved technology can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, up-to-date medical techniques can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern medicines as well as practices are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the thchnological achievement. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both new suegical and practical methods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, increased medical technologies might increase the consequences of blessing an important success. The fundamental espects of the future could relate to this reality the demerits of doctors pertain to patients. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of dramatic points is correlated neatively with a new attitude. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of dramatic possibilities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical technologies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being a curse prove a significance of helping human beings, but also pinpoint wonderful implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.692 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31500588235 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2936271498 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180941134398 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535765478543 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565615582278 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979704538687 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573984675555 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.