The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books, and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Libraries are considered as the knowledge hub since ancient time. However, as the technology overruled every aspect of human life, it also influenced the way we learn new things and share information which eventually redefined the concepts of libraries. Thus digital contents and technological facilities are widely used in public libraries globally and I quite disagree with the notion that these amenities are a waste of resources and space.
Orthodox people often argue that hi-tech libraries distract readers and cost more money. I, on the contrary believe that digital content not only provide better reading experience but also create interest in reading. For example taking a virtual tour of a historical place is far more engaging than reading a book. Similarly, it is much easier and cheaper to manage e-books, DVDs, Videos and software as only one staff can handle everything instead of multiple resources.
Moreover, digital libraries are safer to manage and require limited space. In traditional approach, books require extra care from fire, moisture and humans, as it can be destroyed easily by any of these while, CDs, DVDs can be preserved for years without any maintenance. For instance, Nalanda library in Bihar was the biggest and only place where all the Hindu sculptures, books and ancient history evidences were stored which was put on fire during a war with Mughal emperor hence destroyed all of them. Also, these resources require very little space. Like a single CD can store the content of more than hundreds of books which eventually save lot of space to save paper based books.
To conclude, the transformation of public libraries have made them more beneficial and convenient for readers and researchers as they now work as centre of interactive learning and knowledge sharing. It is expected that traditional libraries would include electronic gadgets and resource to enhance human knowledge and experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-01 | bhupenderpruthi | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-28 | bhupenderpruthi | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | pushpak | 89 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth rather than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter explain the reason for the noise apologise for the noise describe what action you will take 73
- Nowadays plastic money replacements such as credit and debit cards are extremely popular even more than banknotes and coins Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- In many cities many people are living in high rise apartment blocks Does this accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ly redefined the concepts of libraries. Thus digital contents and technological faci...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...res, books and ancient history evidences were stored which was put on fire during...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28478964401 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6895988235 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631067961165 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7791289327 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178381578388 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589514056652 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380383373302 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985446743589 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134463148771 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.