Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty-five can continue to live full and active lives.
In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make?
The health of senior citizens have been neglected significantly over the past few decades. However, with the increasing mortality rate and better health care facility to the elderly, some believe that people over 65 years of age can live full fledged lives. This essay will elaborate the various benefits our senior folk add to the society.
Firstly, the elderly bring expertise in various fields of science and technology. To elaborate, the elderly have practiced and worked on various fields of science for their entire lives. Such a repository of knowledge is a priceless asset that would benefit mankind in numerous ways. For example, a poll conducted by the UCLA showed that 55% of the worlds knowledge and experience was held by those aged above 65 years. Furthermore the experience that the aged possess will help us avoid any errors that they encountered in the past thereby significantly expediting scientific developments.
Secondly, the older citizens bring wisdom that enables an overall balance of life. That is, senior citizens have seen the fast pace of adolescence and the docile path of becoming old. This enables them to teach the younger society of how to live a more balanced life. For instance my grandfather always approached even the most excruciatingly challenging and time critical situations in a calm and orderly manner. In contrast the younger people panic at the drop of a hat. Additionally, such wisdom could also help us disarm any kind of aggressive situation in a focused manner.
To conclude, the senior citizens bring a lot to the table, be it from their experience or through their unending reservoir of wisdom, thereby adding more value to the society as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-18 | Rachana92 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | Ronald88 | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | TheRealUchiah | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 89 | view |
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty five can continue to live full and active lives In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make 78
- Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths To prevent such road accidents the government should ban people under 24 to drive motorcycles 78
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of holidays in a year or people doing different jobs enjoy different amount of holiday time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However others think that zoos are useful to protect rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...cted by the UCLA showed that 55% of the worlds knowledge and experience was held by th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... was held by those aged above 65 years. Furthermore the experience that the aged possess wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ations in a calm and orderly manner. In contrast the younger people panic at the drop of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73916231795 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3170202455 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160175103401 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451879240487 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626648870152 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881166779921 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070930483865 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.