Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The actions of the humankind over the past few years are detrimental to mother earth, and dramatically worsen the environment by polluting air, water, depletion of ozone layer, emmition of hazardous gases into the air. While in the human’s hunger for the globalization, industrialization we forgot about our environment and to take care of it. Moreover, to obtain raw material for industries deforestation, degradation of jungle to expand infrastructure, to setup factories we are catalyst for climate change and global warming. But in under developed countries, even they have preserved their wilderness they are maladjusted to use it in beneficiary way for their people hence, I partly agree with statement that nations should pass the law with certain circumstances and flexible regulations with organized and planned way.
Firstly, we are highly responsible to deteriorate our ecosystem in hunger of economic gain. Excessive setup of industries, building concrete jungles, augmenting carbon footprint, using non renewable source of the energy results in climate change, meting of glacier and finally a global warming. For example if species like bees in the forest are eradicated, then complete food chain will adversely affected and will be the one of the reason for destruction of humankind.
Secondly, on the other hand we talked about sustainability with almost every sector of society but when it come to the the practical approach, we almost remain negligible for execution. Melting of glacier and increasing water level definitely going to affect us very soon. We must not forgot that we are completely staunch on the environment.
On contrary, countries in Africa which are under developed they are completely depend on their forests and wilderness to feed their country. But again to develop on the global level they are sacrificing their preserved forest for economic gain.
In totality, countries which are almost developed or in the process of development must have rules and regulation to hinder the wilderness and on the other hand underdeveloped countries should not completely eschews the regulations. There should be regulated and modulated guidelines on varying context and countries. While the nature should be preserved “natural”, we should understand that the people of “today” should be respected as much as the people of “tomorrow”.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-01 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
2024-07-09 | jiwon12 | 66 | view |
2024-01-10 | Tammy__kk | 83 | view |
2023-09-30 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
2023-05-19 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
- Some people think that parents or other older relatives should make important decisions of their older teenage children Others think that they should do it by themselves What do you think 76
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 60
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 72
- Passage Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of alt 80
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 58
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 367 350
No. of Characters: 1947 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.377 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.305 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.955 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 67 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.467 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.598 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.588 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5