Some people believe that online materials should only be used for a child to learn, whereas others believe only printed materials should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
1Nowadays, Due to the advent of the internet, learning methodologies have been changed drastically. It is considered by some that digital books are the best way for the children to learn to read, while others support a physical version of books. This essay will consider both ideas and explain why I think the modern method of reading online is an excellent option for teaching children.
Firstly, online modality is preferred by some because of the ease of access. One can conveniently choose online material based on the child’s capabilities and also make the experience exceedingly challenging as the student makes progress. Moreover, screen reading is great as they are provided with various in-built features such as highlighting, bookmarking, inbuilt dictionaries and Wikipedia. For instance, if a young student is learning to read English as a second language, there are websites which offer pages with links to dictionaries so that they can look up the meaning in their native language. Such functionalities make the learning process more convenient for both the student and the teacher. Furthermore, online sites are great at the illustrations, they are designed with colorful images and pictures making reading more engaging and interesting for the children.
People who believe in traditional paper-based reading feels that print books are better at conveying information. For avid readers, the feel of the paper is important. Holding a book in hand, the smell of the paper, nice binding and flipping through pages creates an impression in reader’s mind which helps them in remembering the events for longer time. A study reported in the Guardian last year found that readers using an online reader were less likely to recall events in a mystery novel than people who read the same novel in print. Another point that needs to be considered is that the authenticity of the online websites. As anyone can post the material on the internet, children can be provided with false information which might misguide them, whereas published books are designed and authenticated by subject experts, so students can rely on them undoubtedly.
In conclusion, Although, the authenticity of the material provided online is questionable, the benefits that it brings to the children in terms of convenience and accessibility outweighs its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-16 | p.pooja29991 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that online materials should only be used for a child to learn whereas others believe only printed materials should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- It is suggested that all young people should take a period of unpaid work to help local community 73
- some people think tat arts is waste of time but other thinks that it should be included in the curriculum 73
- Spoken communication is always powerful than written communication Do you agree or disagree 78
- Spoken communication is always powerful than written communication Do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
... the best way for the children to learn reading, while others support a physical versio...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng, inbuilt dictionaries and Wikipedia. For instance, if a young student is lear...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...dian last year found that readers using a Kindle/ reading online were less likely to rec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'authenticated'.
Suggestion: authenticated
...guide them, whereas published books are authenticate and designed by subject experts, so stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34139784946 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95710043779 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577956989247 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.670190572 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.1875 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187550569397 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580866781666 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286658508972 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101080568266 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300220315854 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.