Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Today, scandals are common phenomena. Each country at some point in their life has experienced or directly or indirectly suffered from it. Due to its fatty nature, one can see a scandal as a useful measure to get the attention of people. In general, I disagree with the claim and one should do everything to avoid them. However, there are some examples in history which prove a scam can be insightful and help in the betterment of society.
Scandals are the big reason behind any countries' economy, social, and welfare failures. In other words, one doesn't need to wait for a scandal to happen to get attention to problems in society. For instance, the 2G scam, 3G scam, and "chara ghotala" are some of the worst scams that happened in India and these scandals were responsible for the economic slowdown. Some of the big ministers of the ruling party were involved in this scam and that even resulted in the Government failure. Therefore, scandals not only destroy the economy but also destroy the stability of the government. Moreover, there is a high probability that our current socio-economic problems are merely results of some scandals. For instance, many people lost lives, died with hunger, during the recession resulting due to the housing debt scam of 2008. Therefore, scandals do not divert our focus on problems, they create new ones, and to glorify them as useful measures to tackle our existing problems, can result in some bigger problems. Scandals are not useful, they are the evil ones.
Even if we believe that a scandal is an attentive way to identify the root cause of an issue, it does not seem logical to wait for scandals to happen. Scandals are our failures and no one wants failures. Depending on the scandals is just like depending on low marks on a test to get the motivation to study. If you get low marks on a test, you are already behind many students and now you have to perform extraordinarily in the next test to cope-up for this one. Similarly, if you wait for a scandal, to cope-up with the resulting loss, we will need to outsmart in many other fields.
Someone can argue that scandals can be a good way to reveal clandestine immoral activities. For instance, In 2008, Edward Snowden exposed the CIA who was spying on the whole world and from that wave, all Data Privacy charade started. Today, data privacy is the biggest problem for every country, and Data Protection Laws are being created to tackle the issue. In this particular case, a scam revealed one of the biggest problems, which at some point in time was unknown and helped in protecting the privacy of the people. Therefore, scandals can be useful where the cause is unknown and needs telling.
In conclusion, the scandals are not useful, oppositely many of our existing problems are the progeny of them. Therefore, we should focus our attention on our existing problems, some way or other so that we can avoid scandals as far as possible and bypass some bigger problems that they can create.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others Write a response in which you discuss 70
- Educators should base their assessment of students learning not on students grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas trends and concepts that those facts illustrate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 54
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 75
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 69
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News quot The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... Scandals are the big reason behind any countries economy, social, and welfare failures. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d welfare failures. In other words, one doesnt need to wait for a scandal to happen to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... responsible for the economic slowdown. Some of the big ministers of the ruling party were ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79615384615 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59230769231 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0131217495 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9230769231 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 24.0 5.13820224719 467% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209338164324 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060455915875 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360776520329 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123310369279 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232841466081 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.