Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is crucial that an educator takes into consideration how a course can transform the education of students by not just providing them a prodigious amount of knowledge, but also supplying their engagement. Therefore, I agree with the claim that educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of students in order to increase engagement and motivations for learning. While the reason for the claim may be true, other reasons should be accounted for when considering the benefits of shaping a course for the interests of students.
Educators that take into account the interests of students can turn an insipid classroom into an engaging learning experience. Students oftentimes are required to take courses that they may not necessarily be interested in, but are crucial for the sake of their educational experience. For instance, high school students are required to take basic courses, such as math and history. Most students may find those courses to be intimidating or boring. If an educator were to just teach several lessons on the history of economics by skimming through powerpoint slides, then students may lose interest when coming into class everyday learning the same material in the same manner. However, if the educator considered what students may like to learn as part of history, then it will increase their engagement. Students would be motivated to come to class and learn a topic in favor of their interests.
On the other hand, educators who ask for suggestions from students have a higher likelihood of transforming an educational experience. Students are distinct individuals who do not absorb information in the same manner. Some students are visual learners and other students are auditory learners. If educators do not consider how students learn in a classroom setting, it can ultimately hurt the way students learn and engage in a class. Therefore, taking into account the suggestions of how students would like to receive information will not only enhance their experience, but may aid to improve their grades and engagement in a class. Let’s say, for example, students in a math class suggest to see problems physically solved on a board rather than listening to the professor delineate the solution. It would be vital for an educator to take this consideration into account. If not, students may easily be lost and lose interest since it is not in their favor to learn in that manner.
While I do agree with the reason for the claim, which implies that students will be more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying, other reasons should be accounted for. As mentioned earlier, taking the suggestions and considerations of students can enhance their learning experience and improve their grades. Educators who work to shape a course around students' interests will learn their flaws and develop techniques to combat those flaws. For example, a biology student may struggle to study content in class would find it helpful if the educator quizzed the student prior to coming to class in order to see whether they understood the material or not. Hence, it is vital that educators learn from what students suggest and are interested in so that their education can prosper.
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony Last year however private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the 74
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own p 78
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a course for the interests of students. Educators that take into account the int...
^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest seeing'.
Suggestion: suggest seeing
..., for example, students in a math class suggest to see problems physically solved on a board r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2722.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12617702448 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78901681117 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41054613936 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7480881204 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.347826087 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0869565217 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467812841748 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166737041402 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786823018956 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357499143228 0.150359130593 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823322268633 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a course for the interests of students. Educators that take into account the int...
^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest seeing'.
Suggestion: suggest seeing
..., for example, students in a math class suggest to see problems physically solved on a board r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2722.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12617702448 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78901681117 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41054613936 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7480881204 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.347826087 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0869565217 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467812841748 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166737041402 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786823018956 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357499143228 0.150359130593 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823322268633 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.