The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962,1982 and 2002.
A glance at the bar chart given reveals the proportion of persons coming from five countries to Australia for living in 40 years, from 1962 to 2002. These countries were the UK, New Zealand, India, Vietnam, and Italy.
Overall, there was a mixed trend in these five countries. And the total number of immigrants from these countries in 2002 was lower than that in 1962.
In 1962, the highest figure for migrants in Australia was occupied by Italy, at 40%. This percentage was four times as high as the percentage of English and Vietnamese people living in Australia. This year, the proportion of residents immigrating from New Zealand accounted for approximately 8% of the total number of immigrants. And the number of Indian migrants just took up a tiny fraction.
In 1982, the data of Italian residents in Australia halved, becoming the second-largest number after Vietnam and then was followed by a 5% decrease in the next 20 years. The statistic of Vietnamese people moving to Australia hit a peak of 25% in 1982 and also witnessed a moderate fall of 12% afterward. The percentage of immigrants from the UK and India showed a similar trend with Vietnam, peaking in 1982 and reaching to 12% and 14% respectively in 2002. The number of migrants in Australia traveling from New Zealand dropped by 2% every 20 years, becoming the lowest percentage in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | ryannguyen0303 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | nquoc25 | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-25 | dhpt12082003 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | Shivani Miglani | 83 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Gurpreet_5577 | 52 | view |
- the diagram shows how an office building looks at the present and the plan for its future development 73
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea some think they should be banned Do you agree or disagree 78
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and the plans also give a description of the proposed changes in future 73
- the graph below shows the amount of tea and coffee imported by four different countries 92
- Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online Do you advantages of new development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng to 12% and 14% respectively in 2002. The number of migrants in Australia traveli...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75569618689 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5805807621 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367976527643 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129983282686 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982283847434 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219386328713 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441848575341 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.