Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Science and technology has evolved to a magnanimous extent in the past decade. Current modern society is heavily dependent on technology not only to solve pressing issues but also for their quotidian affairs. The prompt recommends that one day science and technology will be able to solve all of society's problems. In my opinion, I mostly disagree, because science and technology might be able to solve plethora of society's existing problems but it can also create quite a few annoying novel problems, for two reasons.
To begin with, society's most pestering problem, unemployment and poverty has increased to a great extant with the advent of science and technology. In other words, development in science and technology has reduced the employment opportunities depriving the poor from the ability to fend for themselves. For instance, technology revolution in the field of automation has snatched the daily jobs from manual/unskilled laborers. People who could not keep up with the new technology are left on the streets begging for survival. Only those who are at par with the new developments in science are progressing in society whilst others are struggling to catch up. This shows that science and technology has aggravated the existing unemployment issue in society rather than solving it.
Furthermore, research shows that the number of wars waged and atrocities against humans have increased along with the development of technology. For instance, countries are coming up with better nuclear weapons with the power of mass destruction, which could wipe out an entire city. Biochemical weapons that can cause loss to an entire nation, is being researched upon by many. Guns that can kill a man at a very far range are easily available to any citizen. Mass shootings at school and church and other holy places where we least expect it are everyday news now. These facts show that science and technology has affected the humanitarian nature of humans, leading to drifts among-st themselves.
However, there are few problems like environmental pollution, connecting people across the world, global trading, extracting minerals from earth etc., which are solved by science and technology. Technology is like a coin, it has both good and bad side to it and it's up to the humans on how they plan to use any new technology for the betterment of the society by solving it's problems or by creating new problems.
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- North America is a continent that is completely within the Northern Hemisphere and almost entirely in the Western Hemisphere It is the third largest continent and has the fourth largest population in the world It was previously thought that the first peop 90
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America s west coast from California to Alaska A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns because of 73
- The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself 66
- The following editorial appeared in the Broomall County Times Picayune The Gordon Act which established a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp is currently up for reauthorization The act prohibits the building of roads or cutting of old growth trees in t 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...er holy places where we least expect it are everyday news now. These facts show tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16030534351 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8402691695 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557251908397 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5979993724 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211141848268 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723789112748 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819121533329 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135088202885 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734291992912 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.