Some people say it is time to say goodbye to real books with real paper because e-readers and e-books are available. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people say it is time to say goodbye to real books with real paper because e-readers and e-books are available" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that real books might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the environment standpoint, e-readers and e-books can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that reducing the paper consumption and preserving trees are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the benefits of e-books on climate change. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both online publications and information broadcast distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, saying goodbye to real books with real paper might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the financial issues of publishers. Moreover, fundamental aspects on reading e-books can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of global access to the Internet can pertain to the quality of infrastructures. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the cost of books were correlated positively with spreading electronic books, the local authorities would ultimately address developing new online materials. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the relationship between e-books and real books.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the availability of e-readers and e-books far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-09 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- Governments promise continuous economic growth but it s actually an illusion Some people think that governments should abandon this Please talk about the validity and the implications 88
- Do you think that young people should be restricted on certain things that they can do such as driving or smoking until they reach the age of 25 What are your views on this 49
- Students can obtain information of academic subject from online the printed books and articles and discussion with their teachers and their peers Which one is the most reliable source 85
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 80
- The chart below shows the amount of spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2363817245 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.054643889 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.181818182 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424203385158 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141487529547 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143225024761 0.071462118173 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227566450268 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135081048767 0.0609392437508 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2363817245 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.054643889 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.181818182 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424203385158 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141487529547 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143225024761 0.071462118173 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227566450268 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135081048767 0.0609392437508 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.