Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as
offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.
Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.
It is an undeniable fact that the smoking tobacco deteriorates the public health and yet only a few countries around the world have imposed restriction against it. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, and there are countries for which it is not feasible or even possible to ban the tobacco. This issue discusses the debate and gives a concluding view.
On one hand, those who support the regulations against tobacco consumption cite the fact that the smoke of tobacco is not only harmful to the smokers, but also to the surrounding people, especially infants and pregnant ladies. They cite the scientifically proven fact that secondhand smoke is far more dangerous than gas emitted by car engine during fuel combustion. Moreover, this camp gives an example of countries like Singapore, where smoking in public places is legally outlawed. They claim that having such rules have improved the public health in the country which is evident from its life expectancy data. To the supporter of such law, these arguments are convincing.
By contrast, officials from countries such as India and Afghanistan, which show no interest in prohibiting smoking in public places, point out that tobacco consumption and export contributes to overall GDP. This is because many farmers and retail sellers are involved in this line of business and they will suffer financially if the governments would pass law against tobacco. Another reason is the presence and the influence of drugs mafia in the parliament which resists passing any laws that can hurt their empire.
Overall, it seems more sensible for any country to outlaw the tobacco consumption to improve the health and life expectancy of its citizens. However, it is difficult for some countries to follow this path either because significant portion of its population earns their living from farming and export of tobacco, or the corrupt politicians make it impossible to have such laws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-24 | msafaie | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | Dyor | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | ashfaqmemon | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | ashfaqmemon | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | void | 75 | view |
- Essay topics You recently bought a piece of equipment for your kitchen but it did not work You phoned the shop but no action was taken Write a letter to the shop manager In your letter describe the problem with the equipment explain what happened when you 81
- You have seen a job advertised in the newspaper You want to apply for the job Write a letter to the manager of the company In your letter provide information about yourself give details of your previous work experience say why the company should consider 78
- In many countries today crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular Why do you think these books and Tv shows are popular What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas 67
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity How far do you share this viewpoint 56
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants Other countries have no intention of doing this Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...at the smoking tobacco deteriorates the general public health and yet only a few countries aro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...nly harmful to the smokers, but also to the people around them, especially infants and pregnant ladies...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hat having such rules have improved the general public health in the country which is evident ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19558359621 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7312892357 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8631563082 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.692307692 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33192587568 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114102355776 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495931138917 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204529849577 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261007496559 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.