A nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college.
It is stated in the above prompt that the Same national curriculum is needed for all students before they enter college. The same national curriculum will help the students grow their knowledge in the same way. They will acquire versatile knowledge before the college level. However, before the high school level, they have already acquired different types of knowledge like social science, English, math,
science, religion, etc for eight years. So, in the high school level, they should start learning at their interesting subjects like arts, commerce, and science, etc. So I do not agree with the given prompt for the following reasons.
First of all, Every student gets their basic knowledge when they complete their high school level. They study basic science, grammar, religion, and basic morality from the type of arts, commerce, and basic subjects. After studying many they gather maturity and want to acquire more knowledge about their interesting subject. If they study the same curriculum before college level, they will lose their liking to study due to study the same type of subject again and again. So before college, they should study their preferred subject to gain more insight into their preferred subject or specialization.
Furthermore, If a student lately starts to acquire his preferred skill, he will enter the job life lately. For this, Many students will be frustrated due to a long time of the study. As a result, the student can discontinue their education and dropout will increase. Also in earlier life, the student can acquire more knowledge due to their brain efficiency.For example, many successful people started acquiring their preferred subject earlier to pursue an interesting subject.
In conclusion, students should start learning their academic preferred subject before college level to get accustomed to their skills earlier. It will help him to enter the job market earlier. So I do not fully agree with the prompt
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 48
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current sa 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college 67
- Sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edge like social science, English, math, science, religion, etc for eight years. ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...knowledge due to their brain efficiency.For example, many successful people started...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27707006369 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49319939981 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480891719745 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4604391038 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0555555556 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266815944306 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101508211162 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957573433873 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154981768207 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100546400619 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.