Selling of fossils
In contrast to the reading, which emphasizes on the disadvantages of selling fossils to public, the lecture focus of identifying the advantages of selling fossils to public. The lecture meticulously counters each of the reasons given by the reading.
First, according to the reading sale of fossil has caused decline in public interest to see the fossil since they are sold rather than placing them in an museum or other similar exhibition. However, the lecturer denies this statement by saying that the sale of fossil to public has increased public exposure to fossil. The lecturer bolsters this statement by giving the example that schools and libraries will buy the fossil which is on the sale and keep it in there schools and libraries for people to see it.
Second, the reading cites that scientists are unable to complete there research on fossil due to the fact that the fossil is sold to public before scientist could view it. Nevertheless, this assertion is rejected by lecturer by saying that fossils are first identified by scientist before companies and people put it on sale. To corroborate this assertion, the lecturer claims that to decide whether the collected material is fossil or not it needs the approval of scientist.
Third, the passage claims that companies that extract the fossil from earth are not very experience, rendering the conclusion that they are not capable to handle the fossil which could lead to destruction of useful scientific evidence. But, the lecturer says that even if some evidence are damaged many of the fossils would be undiscovered if the company was not been permitted to sale the fossil. The lecturer further underpins his statement by saying it is better to lose some evidence than to not discover the fossils at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-02 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | toefl1234 | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-16 | sandeshbhandari2 | 60 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | RishavRishav | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | bijan54 | 81 | view |
- a decline in reading the literature 68
- Selling of fossils 73
- Internet Usage 73
- Our current way of living the life will have impact on future generations Agree of disagree 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ey are sold rather than placing them in an museum or other similar exhibition. How...
^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'was not' or 'has not been'?
Suggestion: was not; has not been
...ls would be undiscovered if the company was not been permitted to sale the fossil. The lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02711864407 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62061304945 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.352402344 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.818181818 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410105086114 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167368284804 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116721215773 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260129873447 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706515757898 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.