In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-to-face meetings.
Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, with the push of the transmitted disease pandemic, online communication is now gain it popularity in companies and even normal lifestyle. At most of workplaces, meeting using internet is now more common than the face to face meeting. This might create many advantages however the undesired effects should not be overlooked.
To look at the bright side, less traditional meeting might be the have a few outstanding benefits. Firstly, with screensharing technologies developed to the state of the art, conference holders won't need to establish many specified equipment just to illustrate the presentation content of the meeting. Secondly, as meeting rooms the normally require large spaces, with this new over the top communication method, the demand for this kind of room can be eased. As a result, organizers don't need to worry about meeting rooms fully booked up, furthermore, companies can save lots of their office spare space for other activities. Last but not least, it gives people who working from home or participating in field working trip the opportunity to engage in important meetings.
Aside of some expected influence, there are some undesirable effects should receive attention. To start with, virtual conference need stable connections of every participators, so sometime, internet issues can cause attendees or even the organizer to disconnect from meeting room. Another unwanted problem is that, organizers might not be able to assure and check attention of participators. Consequently, information which given out in conference can not be fully absorbed or sometime, misleadingly understood occurred. Lastly, since the video gathering can easily be recorded, so the confidentiality of some important meeting won't be assured, this might create some information leaking incidents.
In conclusion, virtual meeting might create convenience as well as desirable benefits but some drawbacks can occurred and should have more attention to handle.
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries fast food restaurants and supermarkets give money to schools to promote their products do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- In many workplaces online communication is now more common than face to face meetings Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 80
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion
- While mobile phones have many advantages a number of problems have also resulted from them or the ways in which they are used What are some of these problems What solutions can you suggest for solving these problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gained'.
Suggestion: gained
...e pandemic, online communication is now gain it popularity in companies and even nor...
^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the workplaces') or simply say ''most workplaces''.
Suggestion: most of the workplaces; most workplaces
...companies and even normal lifestyle. At most of workplaces, meeting using internet is now more com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...m can be eased. As a result, organizers dont need to worry about meeting rooms fully...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59333333333 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07362254604 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0390944188 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183295450753 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642405301069 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924520370653 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135532455931 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137205424946 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.