At one high school, more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments. For example, many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments. The school is considering making a change to help decrease the number of students who cheat on homework. Which one of the following actions do you think will be most effective and why?
Asking parents to monitor their children as they do their homework and confirm that their children have not cheated
Or
Increasing the penalty (punishment) for cheating
Or
Asking teachers to create homework assignments that will make it more difficult for students to cheat
Throughout the history, using other’s effort have been blamed by societies. Nowadays, students normally do not possess the foresight that what they gain through cheating is of no value in the long run, and may spell disaster for their whole life. They cannot achieve their desire job due to the lack of knowledge and skills. Accordingly, the controversial question which has always caused heated debates is whether or not asking parents to behold and supervise their children's homework and asking teachers to contrive difficult homework are appropriate ways to impede student cheating or not. I, nonetheless, hold an alternative perspective and believe that the most momentous and influential way which may prevent students from cheating is increment of their penalty. Further discussion on this topic can be boiled down to a couple of upcoming reasons below.
The first exquisite reason bears in mind is that psychological studies have revealed that set up punishment is among the most effective manners which prevent people, specifically students, from cheating. In this circumstance, a kind of fearful of penalty will arouse in students’ mind which gives rise to stimulation of electrical activities in their mind that inhibits them to do a blamed and impeded task like cheating. For instance, if students have the fear of failing the course provided that they cheat, it will hamper them to do that due to the fact that they would realize the low mark have more value than drop the course. Consequently, teachers can devise particular chastise for those who cheat and use other's attempts instead of making their own efforts.
The second precious reason which will corroborate my standpoint is that, in this economic stagnation, parents are forced to work from dawn till dusk to tackle their essential expenditures. Hardly ever do they find any time to check their children's assignment, let alone watching carful and monitor them during doing homework. As a result, parents are not able to prevent their children from cheating. Moreover, children, nowadays, are extremely swift and they can find new ways to deceive their parents and cheat stealthy. Accordingly, in this circumstance, not only would children not be preclude, but they also would ponder finding new ways to fool their parents, which have a dire consequence in long run as if it will breach the mutual reliability, and arousing plausible friction among parents and their children.
The last but not least point which deserve some words hear is that devising arduous homework assignment would not bear fruit owing to the fact that it may diminish the sense of achievement among astute students who do their homework without cheating. It is axiomatic that the more laborious and difficult the assignments, the less feasibility to be solved which decline children incentive to solve them due to several fiasco during solving.
Contemplating all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the first and the last solution mentioned in the question may not work out. It is highly recommended that teachers devise the most impressive penalty for cheaters.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 90
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 73
- Do you agree or disagree Rather than help children With their schoolwork parents should encourage their children do their work independently 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ich has always caused heated debates is whether or not asking parents to behold and supervise ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...revealed that set up punishment is among the most effective manners which prevent...
^^
Line 5, column 820, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction among parents and their children. The last but not least point which deser...
^^^
Line 6, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...nts and their children. The last but not least point which deserve some words hear is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 411, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fiasco seems to be countable; consider using: 'several fiascoes', 'several fiascos'.
Suggestion: several fiascoes; several fiascos
...children incentive to solve them due to several fiasco during solving. Contemplating all the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, for instance, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2641.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24007936508 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7603642107 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5015171844 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5263157895 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234780963414 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713952130569 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056028491346 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128840242177 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685273887581 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.