some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. others argue that it is better to improve and try such situations.
discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Experiencing some awful periods seems to be inevitable in everyone’s life, and the way how a person takes the situation really represents his ability and potential.
There is a prevailing view that accepting this circumstance might be the most instrumental as learning how to condone a bad circumstance in a peaceful mood may be beneficial to one’s future development. In other words, people can take advantage of this situation to enhance their ability to deal with such difficulties in a rationale way, if they are capable of accepting the situation peacefully. Moreover, as things change so dramatically that nobody can predict the next move, to accept the current situation could be considered as a useful method instead of fighting against it, which is prone to lead to unexpected negative influence.
Some may contend, however, that depending on ourselves to change the condition would be much efficacious than doing nothing. Since it is unlikely for miracles to happen without even an attempt to fight, the condition might stay unchanged for the whole life without any improvement or try. We could see lots of outstanding leaders have a strong desire to change everything that is unsatisfactory and finally make a difference. Perhaps, sometimes what you need is just courage to take the first step. Furthermore, attempting to fight against your bad situations is conducive to enhance one’s resilience under bad circumstances. If a student chooses to escape rather than tackle whenever he meets a problem, there is no doubt he barely could make immense progress on his study.
From my perspective, tackling a difficult situation such as a shortage of money is certainly better than stay unchanged, as you make as much effort as you can at least.
- The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is generally believed that some people are horn with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can he taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Somepeoplethinkthatparentsshouldteachchildrenhowtobegood membersof society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyourownopinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, at least, no doubt, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18531468531 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02187931742 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.193778248 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.818181818 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209734219705 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680593392187 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062615399456 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117202380089 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423538232139 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, at least, no doubt, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18531468531 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02187931742 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.193778248 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.818181818 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209734219705 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680593392187 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062615399456 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117202380089 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423538232139 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.