It is generally believed that some people are horn with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can he taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The above statements present two opposing views regarding whether a good sports person or musician need certain talents. It sounds plausible for the first view that some people are born to be an excellent player or musician. For example, there are always a few students performing much better than others without spending much time in the school. This phenomenon certainly backs up the importance of talents in any fields. Furthermore, reviewing the history of sports, music or whatever fields in this world, almost all of outstanding achievements are obtained by prodigies undoubtedly.
However, this isn’t always true. Without intense training or much effort, it’s not astonishing that gifted people couldn’t be a good player or musician. Even if a person has stunning physical ability in sports, it’s just a waste of talents anyway. However, this isn’t always true. Without intense training or much effort, it’s not astonishing that gifted people couldn’t be a good player or musician. Furthermore, a good attitude plays an important role in this process as well. With arrogant attitude, people wouldn’t learn from failures and make a progress, which will absolutely cause a waste of gift. Nevertheless, it’s not saying talents don’t matter at all since intense effort may help you improve but can’t make you exceptional. An average person can’t be outstanding in a field without gifts no matter how much effort they have made. Therefore, a good player or musician need not only the talents but also much training. Depending purely on either of them is not possible to succeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-26 | AnnaAlysia | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-03 | annaalysia007 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | writingme | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Trinh Bella | 80 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 84
- Thepie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected threere gionsof the world during the 1990s Summarise the information byselecting and reporting the main features and make com 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in jive different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of them is not possible to succeed.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3046875 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72139777676 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9437047263 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200109041852 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621933446704 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525323636264 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176127992543 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670691035433 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.