Is technology time-consuming or does it save time?
Since electronic devices were improved, individuals have been using them for their various needs. During these years of their usage, it is argued whether they have had benefits or drawbacks on spending people’s time. I myself think technology has propelled people to both save time and to over consume based on some reasons which will be clarified later.
To commence with, nobody could able to overlook technology benefits for humans especially not to waste their time. Since applications and social media were appealed, people have been able to carry diverse duties in limited timetable. For example, people used to waste a great deal of time in banks in order to deposit amount of money. Nowadays, individuals have been able to do every of their bank activities not only in their home, but also in less amount of time. Consequently, technology has been extremely effective for people when it comes to argent actions and restricted time period only by utilizing electronic devices.
On the other hand, although developed tools such as computers have had perfect impacts on people’s lives, it has led them to over consume their time. In today’s world, it has been impossible to live without technology because of lots of its usages, but it has made any person with any age group not to use their time effectively and practically. For instance, people have been playing with their computers or surfing on internet particularly in social Medias for no specific purpose. Regarding to spending lots of minutes every day just to post something on Instagram or to watch others’ posts. As a result, lots of moments have been wasted just by searching on the internet.
In conclusion, exactly like every issue which has both worthy and adverse effects on people, technology has not been exceptional. Despite all the negative aspects such as consuming much amount of time, it has had more benefits in this specific subject based on writer’s opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-06 | duc7.5ielts | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tramnguyenngoc0911@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | dear_sohi | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | dear_sohi | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | Kaito Mori | 78 | view |
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 73
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the sun 78
- Topic the tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both vie 73
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, regarding, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07453416149 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62288363011 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9090586648 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260329111278 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962545261865 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847202877992 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178368131271 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400522916702 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, regarding, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07453416149 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62288363011 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9090586648 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260329111278 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962545261865 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847202877992 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178368131271 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400522916702 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.