Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In recent decades, the number of scandals have greately increased. It is probably a result of media growing active every day and access of internet to people all around globe, making world a small village. The prompt suggests that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in multiple way that a speaker or a reformer could ever do. I mostly disagree with this recommendation, however, i do concede that there are some cases in ehich scandals can prove to be beneficial.
First of all, with the rise of media ,especially in south asian countries, every small issues are exxagerated distorting the issues in multiple ways. For instance, Amid covid-19 pandemic, a small land dispute between Nepal and India was exaggerated to a extent that it seemed like a war was about to happen. A small issue that could be solved by a small discussion among the representatives was exaggerated and turned into scandal. This led to protest in both the countries, amid covid-19 crisis, which led to increase in the infected people. So, the exaggeration of small issues to scandals can deviate out focus on certain problems rather than increasing attention to the problems.
Secondly, Scandals instead of getting our focus on certain problems can lead to rise in the multiple problems. For instance, a recent political scandal in India between two political parties divided whole country into two halves. The rate of crimes was at the peak during that period. This scandal proved to be one of the doleful nightmares in the history of indian politics.
Thirdly, scandals are sometimes trigger for a solution to a problem. For instance, In a military school in surkhet, Nepal, there was a collision among student groups and teachers. The issue was about freedom for students. The students got together to solve their problems against the teachers and there was some fight like scenario. This scandal encouraged a different practice between teacher and students. There was a cordial relationship among studens and teachers. So, in some instances there are chances that a scandal can be useful and focus attention on some problems that no other individual could do.
In sum, based on the examples presented above the disadvantages offered by scandals outweighs the perks. Hence, i mostly disagree with the authors recommendation that scandals are beneficial to focus our attention on problems rather they create further obstruction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 55
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current tren 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 58
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...gree with this recommendation, however, i do concede that there are some cases in...
^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l. First of all, with the rise of media ,especially in south asian countries, eve...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ween Nepal and India was exaggerated to a extent that it seemed like a war was ab...
^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...erks. Hence, i mostly disagree with the authors recommendation that scandals are benefi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icial to focus our attention on problems rather they create further obstruction.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14105793451 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76182890959 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506297229219 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1758569063 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7727272727 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233160907116 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067305335074 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861274762541 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138155059142 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056038280718 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.