Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In universities people tend to be concerned more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn Some people propose that students should learn subjects with fast job growth including science tech

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In universities, people tend to be concerned more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with fast job growth, including science, technology, and engineering even if they are interested in other subjects.

In today’s modern world, steering students to what destination is a priority when considering its significant effect on the future of society. In this regard, many would rather oblige students to study in the fields with fast job growth than let them study in their fields of interest. I, though, hold the opposite view for some reason, on which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First, society needs different people with different specializations in various fields to be successful. Restricting students to study in limited areas, which right now we think they are priorities will lead to killing students' creativity. It is much better to educate them to be committed to their interests and passions, and alongside that, learn them to be flexible and be up to date. By recognizing the needs of the people of their era, and execute their knowledge in their interested fields to supplement their people, not only are students interests not jeopardized but also they have a great opportunity to be known as entrepreneurs since they were able to implement the combination of knowledge and specialization together, which can bring about significant educational outcomes.
Furthermore, we cannot deny that every single job has a great contribution to our life, and because of that is much better to respect every students’ interests, and steer them towards their designated destination. Under such a circumstance, students will be more motivated to study, and definitely, they will have more perseverance in their path. The chance of their success in the subject that they are interested in is greater than in other fields even if they are high tech fields. This is because the more interested they are, the more diligent they are, and this will lead to more efficiency and productivity, guaranteeing their success.

In conclusion, with all this taken into account, allowing students to study in their fields of interest will not only not kill their creativity but also fuels their motivations. As a result, a society filling with these types of students will have more creative students, who they are authentic candidates to be an entrepreneur, and they will be more productive in any fields they choose to enter.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-27 MostafaShah91 73 view
2021-02-27 MostafaShah91 76 view
2020-10-21 Taraneh T 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Taraneh T :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...hey are priorities will lead to killing students creativity. It is much better to educat...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14325068871 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92850552615 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520661157025 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5026110499 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9230769231 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203489775994 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079587008981 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355220825301 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130055731576 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138814622783 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.