In todays world, almost every country enjoys freedom of speech and media makes use of this right to a very good extent. Media is ubiquitous and plays and important role in shaping ideas for a society. The intensive research of media brings light to various issues which a society may overlook and hence media is well equipped to prove that every man has a little demon inside him.
To illustrate this behaviour, #MeToo movement started on Twitter revealed a lot of demons of the society who were big faces with an flawless public image.This movement was about women who have faced any kind of harrassment from men. It brought down many people who were once applauded and seen as heros down to their knees. Media played a very crucial role in providing insights on the intensive background check on people under spotligtht and encouraged many women to come forward and gather courage to speak up against any person who assulted her in the past. The widespread response from the society for the movement proved to be provide a validation for the main idea.
Another illustration is about India's famous Nirav Modi. He had a business of diamonds and opened a luxrury brand by his name. He was very well recieved by the public, the media, the customers and the employees. But he swindled National State Banks and used corrupt ways to launder money and get loans. He was at the peak of his business when new of him using unethical ways leaked and media took over to debunk his empire. Media used Right to Information Act from the Indian Constitution to excercise all background information of his company and brought to the world an corrupt face of Nirav Modi.
To conclude, media excercies enough resources to not overlook any misdeed of a living man or woman and prove heros of one time to common person or even worse of another time.
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 80
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... of the society who were big faces with an flawless public image.This movement was...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...big faces with an flawless public image.This movement was about women who have faced...
^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of his company and brought to the world an corrupt face of Nirav Modi. To conc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, look, may, so, well, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73208722741 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42268677407 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591900311526 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3183020954 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166208905222 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523537265562 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483611693284 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103238436393 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514129984623 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.