Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better

Nowadays, there is a population movement toward big cities, the method of generating more accomodations for newly arrived citizen is a controversial topic. In my opinion, expanding the residential area by building taller buildings can have some benefits while utilizing wider land to create more houses also have some desirable effects.

There are a few advantages that vertical cities have compared to horizontally expanded cities. Firstly, by having higher residental towers, more apartments can be supplied for citizens without the need of clearing a massive amount of lands just to make houses. Secondly, with taller buildings, the cites shrinked in land size. As a result, the demand of transportations in far distances is minimized, citizens can just walk or use a bike to travel to their wanted locations. Finally, since the requirement of land space in vertical expanded cities is decreased, more space is left for facilities such as parks, schools and community utilizations.

In another perspective, creating houses on wider lands also have its own expected influences. First of all, since the density of citizens in this kind of city is lower than high-rise metropolitans, the traffic roads are lessly encountered congestion. Another benefit is that, people in horizontal cities have the opportunity to enjoy more activites which take place on the sky, for instance, flying kites or watching the stars. Last but not least, with vertical space less packed, the air quality index in wider metropolitans is better. Therefore, the community health, especially with lung related diseases, can be enhanced.

In conclusion, I believe that providing higher building to supply accomodations in cities can have some advantageous effects. However, there are also desirabe influences that a city built on a wider land can benefited.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43706293706 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98852885368 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611888111888 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5282886498 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246370185208 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799981877995 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106166563007 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16200121808 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847609706198 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.