The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The depicted line graph reveals statistics about the extent of carbon dioxide emissions per person in four different European nations in the period of 1967 and 2007.
Overall, looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the emissions in England as well as Sweden was on the dramatic decline, whereas there was a paradoxical trend in Italy and Portugal. Additionally, the extent of emissions per British was always dominating than the others in the whole period.
In 1967, approximately 10.5 tonnes of CO2 emissions was recorded in England, which was also the highest data in the entire period. By the same year, the datas in Sweden, Italy and Portugal accounted for 8.5 tonnes, 4 tonnes and 1.7 tonnes, respectively. In the next ten year, the proportion in Britain experienced a slight decrease, whereas in Sweden, the data dramatically climbed and hit a peak at over 10 tonnes per Swedish, before being on an extreme decline in the rest of the period. By contrast, CO2 emissions in the other nations were both on the substantial increase.
In 1989, the data in Italy overtook the counterpart in Sweden and then accounted for roughly 7.8 tonnes per person in 1997, which then stabilized in the next 10 year. At the same time, the amount of carbon emission per person in Britain was recorded at 8.5 tonnes, whilst there was an equality between the data in Sweden and Portugal, which both stayed at approximately 5.5 tonnes per person.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-10-06 tr_h.20 73 view
2023-10-06 tr_h.20 73 view
2023-10-05 tr_h.20 67 view
Essays by user hunglg :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, well, whereas, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91020408163 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68048619608 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9693781868 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203432138501 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094463510256 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049027922614 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143984405204 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438649742699 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.