The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The depicted bar chart reveals statistics about consumption behaviors for tea and coffee in five different cities in Australia.
Overall, it is apparently observed from the chart that in exception for Adelaide, the vast majority of people tended to go to cafes for these two beverages. In addition to that, purchasing fresh coffee seemed to be inferior in comparison with the other habits in all five cities.
In Sydney, the proportion of going to cafes accounted for over 60%, more approximately 15% than purchasing fresh and instant coffee. Whereas, the highest rate was recorded in Melbourne, which stayed at nearly 65% of residents who went to cafe. It was followed by buying instant coffee at 53% and fresh coffee at 44%, respectively.
Turning to Brisbane, over 55% of people going to cafe and 53% purchasing for instant coffee, whilst the data of fresh coffee was recorded as two-third compared with the aforementioned habits. Adelaide was the only city which buying instant coffee accounted for the highest at 50%, but it was followed closely by going to cafe with just less than 1%. Given the last city, approximately 63% of Hobart residents often go to cafe, whereas only 55% buying instant coffee, and nearly 40% purchasing fresh coffee, respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-13 soomi2209 73 view
2024-04-13 soomi2209 67 view
2023-12-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-17 Ahmad_off 73 view
2023-12-17 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user hunglg :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so, third, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10576923077 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73273223053 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5686840483 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121294548017 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628025850853 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567202758062 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100660679443 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563259193657 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.