Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of effective teaching and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of agreeing with experienced teachers are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that academic books can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, effective ways of teaching can provide society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of educational books, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of sophisticated tutors. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient experiences are visible.
From a scientific point of view, comparing books with experiences can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of e-books are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inexperienced teachers. Hence, the predicted outcomes of inefficient teaching methods are notable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of more effective teaching ways far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of useless books prove the significance of brilliant experiences, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83408071749 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27971651965 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659192825112 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0794796523 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.272727273 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295467182679 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082707410548 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531261633031 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149781422512 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246116405714 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.