A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
All around the world, countries follow different set of rules regarding the curriculum to be followed until the students reach college level. While some countries mandate a common curriculum, others give the leniency for the students to choose between a state curriculum and a national currriculum. The prompt suggests that a nation should make it mandatory for the students to study the same national curriculum. I agree with the prompt and feel that having a common national curriculum has advantages for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is during the shcool education that students are first exposed to the practice of studying and learning. They start with the basics of everything - right from Mathematics, Science to History and Geography. As students learn different things in these subjects, their minds begin to extrapolate how different things work in the world. It is the knowledge gained in school education upon which they can rely to be a successful students in the subsequent education. If students of different regions study different curriculums, it is possible that the thought process of the students that is developed during the school education(which can become deeply ingrained in them) of one region is different from the students of another region. This disparaty can have a detrimental effect on student's collaboration during college education. As a result, students in the college will not enjoy the college experience as there will be a sense of cacophony. However, if all the students study a common national curriculum in schools, students from different regions can concur seamlessly and make the best of their college life which will inherently affect their careers in the long run.
Secondly, if the states are allowed to come up with their own curriculums, there will be biasness in the facts that the students study. For example, let us take the case of History subject. There were different phases in the fight for independence by India. To make the students feel proud about their state, a state can claim that the people for their state were primarily responsible for the independence, while other states can also do the same. As we can see, there is a biasness in the facts that are presented to the students of different states. Hence, to avoid such biasness creeping into pivotal school curriculums, I would recommend that nations mandate the use of a common national curriculum.
However, in the realms of our discussion, we cannot overlook and exception. Facts and figures related to different regions can get diluted as a national curriculum should be as comprehensive as possible at the same be managable by the school students. To compensate for such loses, the national board should provide optoinal additional material based on regions.
To recapitulate, nations should enlist all the students to study a common national curriculum as it facilitates better collaboration in college and prevent any biasness in what students study. Additionally, the national board should provide study material for each state to compensate for the dilution in national curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | kathleenkong | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 61
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 43
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 58
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 62
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
... which they can rely to be a successful students in the subsequent education. If student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...paraty can have a detrimental effect on students collaboration during college education....
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...marily responsible for the independence, while other states can also do the same....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26653306613 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87634212151 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446893787575 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5173682081 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.260869565 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6956521739 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86956521739 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270513447345 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912095830747 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688451783045 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180459726795 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702089469712 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.