Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast-food-related diseases. The government, therefore, should impose a high tax on fast food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the number of victims of diseases related to fast-food is growing considerably every year. Some suggest that a severe tax should be imposed on fast-food, which is a good idea, in my opinion.
Junk food obviously has adverse effects on people’s health, especially weight. The high contents of fat and carbohydrate in fast food are the main cause of obesity. Fried chicken and deep-fried potatoes, for example, are made with a thick coat of bread-crumb soaked in repeatedly-used oil. Its popularity affects everyone’s daily diet and adds an excessive amount of calories to their bodies. Obesity and other diseases not only diminish their lifespan but also hinder their working ability. Thus, a strict measure should be taken on a national or even international scale.
Applying a high tax is surely a good point because the main reason for fast-food consumption is its low price. With the addition of tax, it is no longer a cheap and available choice. People will opt for purchasing fresh ingredients to make better-valued and healthy meals. Moreover, we could ensure the reduction in the number of junk-food suppliers because if there is a higher tax, the business will seem less lucrative. This also means fewer people can have access to fast-food and related illnesses.
In conclusion, an urgent rate of diseases associated with the use of junk food should be well-aware and tacked. Applying a strict tax level is an effective measure in this case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-26 | qtr.tif | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-15 | fordtottenham | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others however argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Stone Age cutting tools 78
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Stone Age cutting tools 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04098360656 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82767580714 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635245901639 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0940749975 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343691681213 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109031425919 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917790990631 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218856959794 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960923346859 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.