The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
In the graph provided, the amount of enquiries delivered to the Tourist Information Office of a city over the course of six months shows an upward trend for those received in person and by telephone, while that received by mail went down.
Starting in January, the data for queries made in person was the lowest, with mail-in queries in second and telephone first. During the first month, while the number of questions taken in person went up, telephone-based questions decreased considerably. February to March witnessed a rise in enquiries sent in both in person and by telephone, with the latter still taking the lead. Between March and April, however, the number of enquiries received in person boosted, surmounting that of telephone, which stayed unfluctuated at a 1000. For the remaining two months, data for both directly and phoned questions climbed significantly, reaching almost 400 per month.
The case of questions delivered by either letter or email proves to have a drastically different path than the previous two. The numbers fell by a small margin for January, and remained in a plateau state for February. For the next two months, it decreased gradually, staying in another still state in the last month of the record period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09756097561 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74377127058 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4938667553 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219247754049 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082353244542 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115925550151 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181023234296 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153633562575 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.