From the most mundane daily life tasks such as choosing the way to work, to most life changing ones like choosing life partnes, the skill of decision plays a vital role in every spheres of life. In the prompt, the way of making decisions based on sentiments and justifying them with logic afterwards is mentioned. I strongly agree with the arguement and think that taking decisions emotionally can lead to misery, making the decision maker a bad one on this aspect.
First of all, people's emotions change on a whim. What seems right from the emotional perpective today, may not seem right tomorrow. Then the consequence of the decision taken emotionally will lead to contrite only. For example, choosing a life partner who is addicted to drugs or alcohol may seem correct at one stage, just because of the emotional attachment with the person but in the long run, there's a high probability that it will lead to suffereings. The emotional attachment will not stay the same in that case. Then justifying the decision will be totally unwarranted.
Secondly, people often disregard reality when they are emotionally directed. When the difficulties of real life situations hit hard, then they get perplexed. For example, if someone takes the decision of taking a major at college because of some superficial reasons, driven by emotions, without thinking of the job market and possible income after graduating, it may lead to unemployment and financial crisis. Little decisions like buying a super expensive dress just because it looks good will have the same effect as well, on a smaller scale. The justifications made will not save the person from facing the consequences then
Being emotionally directed may sound beautiful and spiritual but in reality decisions should be logically reviewed as well, before acting upon them
- To combat the recently reported dramatic rise in cheating among college students colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton s which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty 54
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be p 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five best selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin Furthermore a recent surve 75
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the way to work, to most life changing ones like choosing life partnes, the skill o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...nt with the person but in the long run, theres a high probability that it will lead to...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...superficial reasons, driven by emotions, without thinking of the job market and p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10333333333 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71771758814 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3767195389 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236586755282 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916334170958 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821620083934 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142028136021 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066329378937 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.