The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is irrefutable that social media has revolutionized the way people communicate with each other and in-person interactions of people with the whole community have gradually substituted by the conversation using smartphones or personal computer. From my perspective, while this recent means of connection may have certain advantageous impacts on people's lives, its disadvantages are much more considerable
To initiate, there is a variety of explanation to support the use of social media as a way to interact with each other. One fundamental benefit of communicating online is due to its convenient and time-saving. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that interacting through the electronic screen allowed people to save an enormous amount of time travelling, thereby avoiding harsh weather conditions, traffic congestion and other unnecessary incidents. Furthermore, online communication allowed people to stay in touch with their close-knit ones or held a conference without the difficulties originated from geographical distance and natural or artificial catastrophes. By the way of exemplifying, online conferencing in 2020 has become more prevalent than ever because of the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic
Nevertheless, the adverse impacts of replacing face-to-face interaction with social media are still somewhat outweighed its plus points due to various reasons set forth below. First and foremost, interacting via the internet are allegedly unable to transmit the messages as straightforward as direct communication. There seems to be evidence that internet connection in some regions is relatively inadequate and therefore, it may end up disconnection in the middle of the conversation. In that case, misinterpretation and hereby conflicts are inevitable. On the second place, using the electronic appliances for a long period during the day is extremely detrimental to human's well-being since it may be the major culprit for several eyes diseases, for instance, nearsightedness or astigmatism
Due to these aforementioned reasons, the advantages of substitution of in-person interaction with the online ones are probably overshadowed when compared to the disadvantages of this replacement
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The migration of people to cities is one of the biggest problems facing the world s cities today Discuss the main causes What solutions can be used to tackle the situation 73
- It s generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist Discuss both these views and give 84
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 90
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86068111455 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53090783565 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61919504644 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.809398434 49.4020404114 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.3 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226033815342 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711682118445 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072086464958 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131178508748 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307370672817 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 13.62 50.2224549098 27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.3 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.