In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
It is indisputable fact that in today's fast-paced world, working considers one of the most significant aspects of an individual's life since it plays a vital role in affording the cost of living and brings a sense of satisfaction in life. In this regard, some people approve of this idea that it is more advantageous to work slowly with more attention in comparison to working quickly in careless ways. However, others hold the opposite point of view. Personally, I concur with the idea that working at a slow pace with focusing on duties in order to ensure the correctness of everything is more beneficial. I substantiate my standpoint as follows.
To commence with, the lower speed of working, the more accurate evaluation of tasks culminating to guarantee to achieve high quality and optimum outcome. To delineate, should people working slowly in order to contemplate a variety of aspects related to their assignment, they will attain comprehensive and in-depth knowledge about drawbacks and boons that might be encounter during accomplishing the work. In this vein, By knowing these cons and pros and had sufficient time to enhance and level up the Brightside of the tasks and resolve obstacles which lead to sought-after performance and desirable results in works. On the contrary, hasty accomplishing tasks give rise to gain superficial knowledge and information connected to work affecting adversely in the outcome, consequently. Therefore, working slowly with more attention and concentration could have resulted in notable achievement and boost up the quality of work.
The second worth-mentioning reason that comes into my mind is that the more pace in doing duties, the lower accuracy of working giving rise to the increasing possibility of making mistakes. To put in the more vivid picture, should individuals speed-up their working, this will be sacrifice correctness and preciseness since they do not have sufficient attention to all facet of duties and dismiss them arbitrarily. It is worth mentioning, in some professions, making mistakes due to working quickly could be at cost of human lives or irrecoverable damage. To exemplify, in a health profession such as medicine, every involved person in the healthcare system should do their duties slowly and with an extra focus in order to prevent mistakes that could be extremely serious and endanger a person's life. Thus, it is crucial for the person to ensure every step of their work is flawless and reduce this risk of fault as much as possible.
To draw a conclusion, I advocate the notion that it is pivotal to work carefully and slowly rather than hasty with risk error. This is because not only do work in lower speed enhance performance and lead to achieve the optimum outcome but it also by increasing accuracy prevent making mistake giving rise to the irreparable sequel.
- tpo31 task 1 85
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reaso 76
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 70
- teachers today do not get respect 75
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reaso 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e of the most significant aspects of an individuals life since it plays a vital role in aff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...substantiate my standpoint as follows. To commence with, the lower speed of wor...
^^^
Line 5, column 790, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...uld be extremely serious and endanger a persons life. Thus, it is crucial for the perso...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14870689655 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95129203326 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506465517241 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5369676674 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.529411765 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2941176471 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339897152202 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100638527692 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072410758941 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207077809337 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341209230241 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e of the most significant aspects of an individuals life since it plays a vital role in aff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...substantiate my standpoint as follows. To commence with, the lower speed of wor...
^^^
Line 5, column 790, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...uld be extremely serious and endanger a persons life. Thus, it is crucial for the perso...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14870689655 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95129203326 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506465517241 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5369676674 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.529411765 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2941176471 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339897152202 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100638527692 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072410758941 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207077809337 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341209230241 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.