It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?
The expenditure on conserving the valuable gems of nature such as wildlife, flora and fauna can be readily seen at a large extent by the government. However, there are people opposing this view and state that other issues prevailing in the society are more crucial to be solved and spent on. Although, there are numerous factors for both the opinions to be discussed on, I agree with the first one since it highlights the importance of wildlife and environment. The subsequent paragraphs shall define my opinion in detail.
To commence with, protection of endangered species and those on the verge of extinction is essential. Firstly, plants and animals form a significant part of the food web, thereby, affecting other natural factors depending upon them. For instance, if the frog species are eliminated from the food chain, the snakes and the animals preying on them would suffer from an acute starvation, hence, every animal specie is important. The same goes with the plants, if one is completely depleted, shall affect the herbivores and other endemic flora. Therefore, it is essential to save them and expend money on such projects.
Secondly, due to modernisation and industrialisation , there has been a drastic impact on forests and wildlife. According to a survey in 2019, the population of forests has collapsed to about a half of their population in 5 decades, which has broken the world record. If their existence is endangered, the life-givers (trees and plants) providing the life-gas, a necessity, oxygen will increasingly diminish, therby, endagering anthropogenic, human existence. So, it is rightful to expend monetary funds by the official government authorities on preserving the wildlife and environment.
To sum up, I completely agree that the executive authorities ought to spend a sum of money on flora and fauna conservation through various projects and allocating a certain amount of funds on this task.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | zhao_kangg | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | souravsaini93160 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | DNTMdntm | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | Anas Shaikh | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | DQDang | 89 | view |
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e to modernisation and industrialisation , there has been a drastic impact on fore...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25161290323 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01178572927 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4170550496 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118774096617 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340912158494 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354395591795 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654156515731 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280170105548 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.